Liberal Zionism Is the Future (And the Left Is Complicit) 🎭🔮🇮🇱

A FriedReads Prediction About the Next Phase of Zionism (And Why You Should Be Paying Attention)

October 2026

In the previous entry, I wrote about liberal Zionism.

I explained what it is. I explained how it works. I explained why it's a problem. I explained how it normalizes colonialism with a "kind" mask.

Now I'm going to explain where it's going.

Because here's the thing about ideologies. They could die. Or they adapt. They evolve. They find new ways to survive. They find new hosts to infect.

Zionism is no different.

Support for Israel is at an all-time low. The public is waking up. People are seeing what's happening in Gaza. People are seeing what's happening in the West Bank. People are seeing the settlements, the occupation, the apartheid. People are seeing the war in Iran and wondering why we're involved.

The Zionists know this. The people in Israel know this. They know they're losing the public.

But they're not giving up.

They're adapting.

And liberal Zionism is the adaptation.

This is part two. The prediction. The future. The next phase.

And it's already happening.

Support Is Down, But the Machine Keeps Running

Let me set the context.

Support for Israel is down. Not just among Democrats. Among everyone. The polls are clear. The numbers are clear. The trend is clear. People are waking up.

The war in Iran made it worse. Much worse. People are watching their oil prices go up. People are watching their economy struggle. People are watching their friends and family get drafted. People are watching a war that makes no sense, for a country that has no business being involved in our affairs.

The public is turning against Israel. The public is turning against Zionism. The public is turning against the whole enterprise.

And the Zionists know it.

They know they're losing. They know the tide is turning. They know the old playbook isn't working anymore.

But they're not giving up. They're not going away. They're not admitting defeat.

They're adapting.

They're evolving.

They're finding new ways to survive.

And liberal Zionism is that adaptation.

The Prediction: The Blue Wave Is Coming

Here's my prediction.

There's going to be a blue wave.

The Democrats are going to win the midterms. Maybe not by a landslide. Maybe not by a huge margin. But they're going to win. The pendulum always swings. The out-of-power party always gains. It's the way the system works.

And guess what.

The war in Iran will continue.

Things will continue to get worse.

The Democrats will blame Trump. That's what they'll be forced into. That's the narrative. That's the story. Trump started the war. Trump made the mess. Trump is the reason everything is falling apart.

But in reality, they also want this war.

Both parties are controlled by Zionists.

The only difference is: Republicans are explicit. Democrats are subtle.

The Kamala Theory: They Wanted Her to Lose

Let me talk about something that's been on my mind.

Kamala Harris was running in 2023 and 2024. Most rational people knew she was going to lose. Even Kamala knew. Even the Democrat elites knew.

So why choose her?

Why pick a candidate with such low polls? Why pick a candidate with so much baggage? Why pick a candidate who couldn't even win her own primary?

Because they wanted her to lose.

That's my theory. I could be wrong. But it makes sense.

Think about it. Trump made a bunch of campaign promises that were popular. No new wars. Better economy. Drain the swamp. All lies, obviously. But the promises were popular. He played it well. That campaign was effective. He knew what to say. He knew what people wanted to hear.

Kamala had nothing. She had no message. She had no vision. She had no energy. She was a ghost. She was a placeholder. She was a candidate who was set up to fail.

And I think that's the point.

The establishment, the people in power, they wanted her to lose.

Why?

Because they needed Trump to win.

They needed Trump to start this war.

Let's flip it for a second. Let's say the Democrats won. Let's say Kamala became president. Let's say she started this war in Iran.

What would happen?

The outrage would have been visceral. It would have been fierce. It would have been overwhelming. Republicans would have been furious. But also, Democrats would have been furious. The anti-war left would have been furious. The people who voted for her would have felt betrayed. There would have been protests. There would have been riots. There might have been a rebellion.

Maybe not. Who knows. It's an assumption. But I feel like there would have been a fiercer reaction if Democrats started this war.

Trump was perfect.

Trump was the only one who could start this war.

Because Trump's base would support him no matter what.

They would support him if he started a war. They would support him if he killed people. They would support him if he burned the world down. They would support him if he did anything.

They defended him when he was accused of rape. They defended him when he was accused of fraud. They defended him when he was accused of collusion. They defended him when he was accused of insurrection. They defended him when he was accused of stealing classified documents. They defended him when he was accused of paying hush money to a porn star.

They defended him when he was accused of everything.

And now they're defending him over Epstein.

They're defending him over a child trafficker.

So they'll defend him over a war.

They'll defend him over anything.

It had to be Trump.

Because if Democrats started this war, there would be outrage from both sides. But if Trump started this war, there would only be outrage from the Democrats. And the Democrats can be dismissed. They can be labeled. They can be silenced.

Let me repeat! It had to be Trump.

That's why they wanted Kamala to lose.

That's why the establishment set up a candidate who couldn't win.

The Hijacking: The Left Is Being Co-Opted

Now here's the part you need to pay attention to.

Support for Israel is at an all-time low. The public hates Israel. The public hates Zionism. The public hates what's happening in Gaza.

The Democrats are likely to win the midterms. Maybe even 2028. The pendulum is swinging. The blue wave is coming.

Here's the thing.

Even though the public hates Israel, the Democrats still help them.

Even though the public hates Zionism, the Democrats still serve it.

Even though the public hates what's happening in Palestine, the Democrats still fund it.

How?

By hijacking the left.

Let me give you some examples.

Zohran Mamdani. The Mayor of New York. A democratic socialist. A man who has been critical of Israel. A man who has said he would arrest Netanyahu if he came to New York.

But remember, he gave $30 million to fight antisemitism.

And remember, for the Palestinians? A tree planted.

For the people who are being bombed. For the people who are being displaced. For the people who are being murdered. For the people who are losing their homes, their families, their lives.

A tree.

But it doesn't stop there.

James Talerico. A Democratic candidate in Texas. He's running for Congress. He's a moderate. He's a veteran. He's the kind of candidate who could win in a red state.

And he's a liberal Zionist.

Abdul El-Sayed. A Democratic candidate in Michigan. He's running for Senate. He's a progressive. He's a doctor. He's the kind of candidate who could energize the left.

And he said he "venerates" the Jews.

Venerates.

He doesn't say that for any other people. He doesn't say that for Christians. He doesn't say that for Muslims. He doesn't say that for Catholics. He doesn't say that for Buddhists. He doesn't say that for Hindus. He doesn't say that for any other religious group.

He only says it for Jews.

Why?

Because he has to.

Because he has to prove he's not an antisemite.

Because if he doesn't, he'll be labeled. He'll be smeared. He'll be called a terrorist sympathizer. He'll be called a Muslim extremist. He'll be called everything in the book.

So he says he "venerates" the Jews.

And what does he do next?

He gives millions to combat antisemitism in Michigan.

That's the play. That's the game. That's how it works.

You prove you're not an antisemite by donating millions. You prove you're not an antisemite by venerating the Jews. You prove you're not an antisemite by doing whatever the Zionists want you to do.

These are the future of America. These are the candidates who are going to lead the party. These are the people who are going to shape policy.

And they're being co-opted.

The only way for Zionism to survive is to hijack them.

And it's already happening.

The Labeling: The Weaponization of Antisemitism

Let me talk about the mechanism.

Antisemitism is a problem. Yes. I'm not saying it isn't. There are people who hate Jewish people. There are people who want to harm Jewish people. There are people who believe in conspiracy theories about Jewish people.

How do we stop it?

Maybe we spend millions on the Jewish community. Maybe we fund education programs. Maybe we support synagogues. Maybe we do all the things that people say we should do.

I don't think it will work.

I think it will make it worse.

Because here's the thing.

Antisemitism has been weaponized. It's been used to justify this. It's been used to silence critics. It's been used to shut down debate. It's been used to control the narrative.

Label anyone an antisemite, and they have to prove they're not.

How do you prove it?

By donating millions.

By venerating the Jews.

By doing whatever the Zionists want you to do.

Both parties know this. That's why El-Sayed says what he says. That's why Mamdani does what he does. That's why Democrats fall in line.

They know the game. They know the rules. They know what happens if they don't play along.

And that's the problem.

The label has been weaponized. It's been used to silence people. It's been used to control people. It's been used to make people do things they wouldn't otherwise do.

And it works.

The Loomer Example: The Vile Individual

Now let me talk about someone who makes my skin crawl.

Laura Loomer.

I wish I could forget this person exists. I wish I could erase them from my memory. I wish I could pretend they never existed.

But here we are.

Laura Loomer is a vile individual. A disgusting person. A human being who has decided to dedicate their life to spreading hate and division and nonsense.

This individual has said some very disgusting things.

Something along the lines of, "Maybe we need another 9/11 so America knows who the enemies are."

Another 9/11.

Another attack on American soil.

Another thousands of people dead.

She said that. She put it out into the world. She said it out loud.

And no one cared.

Maybe a few genuine Democrats. Maybe a few people who still have a functioning moral compass. But no one overall cared. No one overall lost their mind. No one overall demanded accountability.

She said it.

And then she moved on.

And then she started attacking Mamdani.

She called him a jihadist. She called him a Muslim terrorist. She called him an antisemite.

An antisemite.

Mamdani. A man who has been critical of Israel. A man who has been critical of Zionism. A man who has said he would arrest Netanyahu if he came to New York. A man who attended an event commemorating the victims of October 7th.

He's the antisemite.

Not Loomer. Not the person who said we need another 9/11. Not the person who said we need more dead Americans. Not the person who spreads hate and division and nonsense.

Mamdani is the antisemite.

There's nothing he did that is antisemitic. At least as far as I know. At least as far as I can see. At least as far as anyone can prove.

But that doesn't matter.

Because the label has been applied.

And once the label is applied, it doesn't matter if it's true. It doesn't matter if it's accurate. It doesn't matter if it's fair.

The label sticks.

And that label justifies everything.

It justifies him donating millions to fight "antisemitism."

It justifies him venerating the Jews.

It justifies him doing whatever the Zionists want him to do.

It makes it so, from the viewpoint of Democrats, he has to do this.

He has to prove he's not an antisemite.

He has to prove he's not what they say he is.

He has to prove his loyalty.

And how do you prove your loyalty?

By donating millions.

By venerating the Jews.

By doing whatever the Zionists want you to do.

And that's the trick. That's the game. That's how it works.

Label anyone an antisemite, and they have to prove they're not.

And the only way to prove it is by giving the Zionists what they want.

Laura Loomer knows this. She knows exactly what she's doing. She knows that by calling Mamdani an antisemite, she's forcing him into a corner. She's forcing him to prove himself. She's forcing him to give the Zionists what they want.

And she's not the only one.

There are others. There are many others. There are entire media ecosystems dedicated to this.

They label. They smear. They defame.

And the people who are labeled are forced to respond.

And the only way to respond is by giving in.

That's the system. That's the framework. That's how it works.

The Framework: Both Parties Serve the Same Master

Let me put it all together.

Both parties are controlled by Zionists.

The Republicans are explicit about it. They say it out loud. They don't hide it. They fly to Israel. They wear yarmulkes. They speak at AIPAC. They do whatever the Zionists want, and they do it proudly.

The Democrats are subtle about it. They hide it. They use progressive language. They talk about "peace" and "justice" and "human rights." They pretend to be on the side of the oppressed. But they do the same thing.

They fund Israel. They support the war. They donate millions to fight "antisemitism." They venerate the Jews. They do whatever the Zionists want.

The only difference is the marketing.

The way they fight in public is for spectacle. For control.

A Republican on Twitter said Kamala running again would be the easiest win for Republicans. He's right. But it doesn't matter. Because they're all controlled. They're all bought. They're all serving the same master.

What candidate would actually be a threat to the Republicans?

AOC. Gavin Newsom. Maybe Kamala.

But they're all controlled one way or another by Zionism.

Even if they run. Even if they win. Even if they become president.

The war in Iran is going to continue.

Nothing is going to change.

Because both parties have one common goal: the preservation and influence of the American empire.

That's what they want. That's what they serve. That's what they've always served.

And Zionists make it possible.

Zionists make it possible for both parties to serve the empire. Zionists make it possible for the war to continue. Zionists make it possible for the status quo to be maintained.

And that's the system. That's the framework. That's how it works.

The Final Line

Liberal Zionism is the future.

Not because it's popular. Not because it's right. Not because it's just.

Because it's the only way for Zionism to survive.

The public is waking up. The tide is turning. The old playbook isn't working anymore.

So they're adapting.

They're hijacking the left. They're co-opting the progressives. They're forcing the candidates to prove their loyalty. They're using the label to silence the critics.

And it's working.

The left is complicit. The candidates are falling in line. The war is continuing. The empire is being preserved.

And no one is talking about it.

Except me. And I have zero readers. So hahahaha. I say whatever I want.

Also, this won't be my last article on this topic. I still have a lot to say. But it's gotten long enough as it. I repeated myself a lot, but I had to get the points across. Deal with it, all of my 0 readers 🤣.

🎭🔮🇮🇱

Allen

FriedReads.com | Still thinking. Still ranting. Still hoping I'm wrong.

October 2026